From 2004 to 2024, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) funded the National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetics Networks (NCC). NCC developed and maintained the Genetics Policy Hub.

 

With the conclusion of NCC funding, the Genetics Policy Hub (GPH) will no longer be updated or maintained. Information on GPH should be used for historical reference only.

Genome Sequencing

Updated On Sep 19, 2024

This information is meant to be used for educational purposes to inform providers, patients, and genetic service delivery stakeholders about genetics policy topics. Sharing of information, resources, or policy statements is no way an endorsement of stated positions by NCC.

Introduction

Genomic sequencing is a genetic test that can provide information about the nucleotide sequence of an individual’s DNA. (Nucleotide sequences are the building blocks that make DNA.) When people have genetic testing, the scientists typically look at the sequence for a particular part of a gene or genes. Other genetic tests look at most of a person’s “genome” or “exome”. A genome is all of a person’s DNA, while an exome is just the DNA that encodes (is used to make) proteins.

Numerous articles that discuss ethical issues surrounding genome sequencing can be accessed by clicking on each title:

A major area of concern is with secondary findings. A secondary finding is an unexpected finding that isn’t directly related to the reason the test was ordered. The more of a person’s DNA that is sequenced, the more likely it is one might uncover a “secondary finding.” An example of a secondary finding follows:

  • Steve has incontrollable movements. His neurologist is unsure of his diagnosis and recommends genetic testing. He gives Steve two options: a panel of all of the genes that are likely to cause incontrollable movements or whole exome sequencing (WES). Steve choses WES, which does not determine the cause of his uncontrollable movements, but does show that he has a genetic mutation that puts him at higher risk of developing colon cancer. The high-risk colon cancer mutation is a secondary finding.

Our policy page on secondary findings can be found here.

Legislation and Regulation

There are no laws or regulations that apply specifically to genome sequencing, as opposed to other tests.  

 

Are you interested in learning what your state’s government or the federal government are currently proposing for either legislation or regulation? Check out Legislative/Tracking system for up-to-date information and subscribe to our Twitter channel to get the latest updates in your pocket.

Policy Positions

Organizations working within the genetics community (national genetic organizations, advocacy organizations, etc.) have published positions on genome sequencing. Explore these position statements below.

 

Position Statements by Organizations
Joint Position Statement from the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis (ISPD), the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM), and the Perinatal Quality Foundation (PQF) on the use of genome-wide sequencing for fetal diagnosis
Organization
International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis (ISPD), Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Perinatal Quality Foundation (PQF)
Subject
Genome Sequencing Genetic Testing
Date
Incidental findings in clinical genomics: a clarification
Organization
American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Subject
Genome Sequencing Secondary Findings
Date
July 4, 2013
ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing
Organization
American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Subject
Genome Sequencing Secondary Findings
Date
June 20, 2013
Points to Consider in the Clinical Application of Genomic Sequencing
Organization
American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Subject
Genome Sequencing Genetic Testing
Date
May 15, 2012
Points to consider for informed consent for genome/exome sequencing
Organization
American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Subject
Genome Sequencing Informed Consent
Date
August 22, 2013
Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2021 update: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Organization
American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
Subject
Secondary Findings Genome Sequencing
Date
February 22, 2021

TwitterFacebookMessengerRedditLinkedInPinterestWhatsAppEmail